e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2009.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number (0-21767)
ViaSat, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
33-0174996
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
6155 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, California 92009
(760) 476-2200
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, $0.0001 par value, as of
November 2, 2009 was 31,880,312.
VIASAT, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
83,884 |
|
|
$ |
63,491 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
206,816 |
|
|
|
164,106 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
67,364 |
|
|
|
65,562 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
26,724 |
|
|
|
26,724 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
18,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
407,947 |
|
|
|
338,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and satellite, net |
|
|
214,527 |
|
|
|
170,225 |
|
Other acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
13,788 |
|
|
|
16,655 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
65,429 |
|
|
|
65,429 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
36,827 |
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
738,518 |
|
|
$ |
622,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
58,223 |
|
|
$ |
63,397 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
81,126 |
|
|
|
72,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
139,349 |
|
|
|
135,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24,443 |
|
|
|
24,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
243,792 |
|
|
|
160,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ViaSat, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
288,413 |
|
|
|
273,102 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
204,915 |
|
|
|
187,471 |
|
Common stock held in treasury |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ViaSat, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
490,744 |
|
|
|
458,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
494,726 |
|
|
|
462,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
738,518 |
|
|
$ |
622,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
160,666 |
|
|
$ |
159,280 |
|
|
$ |
319,074 |
|
|
$ |
312,241 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
111,656 |
|
|
|
115,551 |
|
|
|
223,369 |
|
|
|
223,571 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
28,927 |
|
|
|
25,430 |
|
|
|
55,843 |
|
|
|
49,034 |
|
Independent research and development |
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
13,695 |
|
|
|
16,496 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
4,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
12,029 |
|
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
23,300 |
|
|
|
18,460 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
11,900 |
|
|
|
9,780 |
|
|
|
23,089 |
|
|
|
19,553 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
5,705 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,092 |
|
|
|
9,275 |
|
|
|
17,384 |
|
|
|
15,645 |
|
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. |
|
$ |
9,175 |
|
|
$ |
9,258 |
|
|
$ |
17,444 |
|
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to ViaSat,
Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.56 |
|
|
$ |
.51 |
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to ViaSat,
Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
.29 |
|
|
$ |
.53 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic net income per share |
|
|
31,616 |
|
|
|
30,743 |
|
|
|
31,407 |
|
|
|
30,633 |
|
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share |
|
|
33,047 |
|
|
|
32,138 |
|
|
|
32,916 |
|
|
|
31,890 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,384 |
|
|
$ |
15,645 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
9,901 |
|
|
|
8,878 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,902 |
|
|
|
5,754 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
5,094 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(42,544 |
) |
|
|
(2,461 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
|
|
488 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,481 |
) |
|
|
(2,611 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,187 |
|
|
|
(11,989 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
18,403 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, equipment and satellite |
|
|
(55,784 |
) |
|
|
(50,556 |
) |
Payments related to acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(925 |
) |
Cash paid for patents, licenses and other assets |
|
|
(5,886 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(61,670 |
) |
|
|
(52,926 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line of credit |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(2,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
Purchase of common stock in treasury |
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment on secured borrowing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,720 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of stock of majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
80,756 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
20,393 |
|
|
|
(34,386 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
63,491 |
|
|
|
125,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
83,884 |
|
|
$ |
90,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in satisfaction of certain accrued employee compensation liabilities |
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ViaSat, Inc. Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Treasury |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares Issued |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 3, 2009 |
|
|
31,114,086 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
273,102 |
|
|
$ |
187,471 |
|
|
|
(66,968 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
4,042 |
|
|
$ |
462,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
243,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options and release of restricted stock
unit (RSU) awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock under Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
|
|
85,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in settlement of certain
accrued employee compensation
liabilities |
|
|
192,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
RSU awards vesting |
|
|
138,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares pursuant to
vesting of certain RSU agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,193 |
) |
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
17,384 |
|
|
$ |
17,384 |
|
Foreign currency translation, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 2, 2009 |
|
|
31,774,754 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
288,413 |
|
|
$ |
204,915 |
|
|
|
(121,161 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,000 |
) |
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
3,982 |
|
|
$ |
494,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at October 2, 2009, the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009 and
October 3, 2008, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended
October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008 and the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders
equity and comprehensive income for the six months ended October 2, 2009 have been prepared by the
management of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company), and have not been audited. These financial statements
have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the
fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the
fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interim
operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year. The
year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not
include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (GAAP).
The
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of
operations of TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (TrellisWare), a majority-owned subsidiary of ViaSat.
All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
The Companys fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to March 31 of
the specified year. For example, references to fiscal year 2010 refer to the fiscal year ending on
April 2, 2010. The Companys quarters for fiscal year 2010 end on July 3, 2009, October 2, 2009,
January 1, 2010 and April 2, 2010. This results in a 53 week fiscal year approximately every four
to five years. Fiscal year 2010 is a 52 week year, compared with a 53 week year in fiscal year
2009. As a result of the shift in the fiscal calendar, the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
included an additional week. The Company does not believe that the extra week results in any
material impact on its financial results.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best
available information and actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates
made by management include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, self-insurance reserves,
allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty accrual, valuation of goodwill and other intangible
assets, patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses, software development, property, equipment and
satellite, long-lived assets, income taxes and valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued authoritative guidance on the
Codification (Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168 (SFAS 168), FASB
Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles / ASC 105). The authoritative guidance on the Codification (SFAS 168 / ASC 105)
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM (Codification or ASC) as the single source
of GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all
existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting
literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. Following the
Codification, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards
Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the
guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification. GAAP is not
intended to be changed as a result of the FASBs Codification project, but it will change the way
the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact
on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
Company has implemented the Codification in this quarterly report, and has provided references to
the Codification topics alongside references to the existing standards.
On April 4, 2009, the beginning of the Companys first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the
Company adopted the authoritative guidance for noncontrolling interests (SFAS 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 /
7
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
ASC 810-10-65-1). The Company adopted the authoritative guidance for
noncontrolling interests on a prospective basis, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. As a result, the Company
reclassified to noncontrolling interest, a component of stockholders equity which was previously
reported as minority interest in consolidated subsidiary in the mezzanine section of the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheets and reported as a separate caption within the Companys
condensed consolidated statements of operations, net income including noncontrolling interest, net
income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, and net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. In
addition, the Company utilized net income including noncontrolling interest as the starting point
on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of cash flows in order to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities, rather than beginning with net income, which was
previously exclusive of the noncontrolling interest. These reclassifications had no effect on
previously reported consolidated income from operations, net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. or
net cash provided by operating activities. Also, net income per share continues to be based on net
income attributable to ViaSat, Inc.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for business combinations (SFAS 141R,
Business Combinations, / ASC 805). The purpose of issuing the statement is to better represent
the economic value of a business combination transaction. The changes effected with the
authoritative guidance for business combinations from the previous guidance include, but are not
limited to: (1) acquisition costs will be recognized as expenses separately from the acquisition;
(2) known contractual contingencies at the time of the acquisition will be considered part of the
liabilities acquired measured at their fair value; all other contingencies will be part of the
liabilities acquired measured at their fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet
the definition of a liability; (3) contingent consideration based on the outcome of future events
will be recognized and measured at the time of the acquisition; (4) business combinations achieved
in stages (step acquisitions) will need to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as
well as non-controlling interests, in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values; and
(5) a bargain purchase (defined as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair
value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration
transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree) will require that excess to be
recognized as a gain attributable to the acquirer. The authoritative guidance for business
combinations became effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The guidance
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after April
4, 2009, except that resolution of certain tax contingencies and adjustments to valuation
allowances related to business combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, will be
adjusted to income tax expense for all such adjustments after April 4, 2009, regardless of the date
of the original business combination. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2010.
In accordance with this guidance, the Company recognized $2.5 million in transaction
expenses related to the acquisition of WildBlue (see Note 13 for a discussion of the
WildBlue acquisition) in its condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three and six months ended October 3, 2009.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing this Form 10-Q with the
SEC on November 10, 2009. See to Note 14 for a discussion of subsequent events.
Property, equipment and satellite
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures and the Companys satellite under
construction are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The Company generally computes
depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging
from two to eleven years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the improvement. Additions
to property, equipment and satellite, together with major renewals and betterments, are
capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals and betterments are charged to expense. When
assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or
amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized.
Satellite construction costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured under long-term contracts that provide for payments over the
contract periods and are capitalized as incurred. In addition, interest expense is capitalized on the carrying value of the satellite during the construction period. The Company capitalized $1.2 million of interest
expense during the three and six months ended October 2, 2009. No amounts were capitalized during
the same periods last fiscal year.
Patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses
The Company capitalizes the costs of obtaining or acquiring patents, orbital slots and orbital
licenses. Amortization of intangible assets that have finite lives is provided for by the
straight-line method over the shorter of the legal or estimated economic life. The Company
capitalized $2.3 million and $1.8 million of costs related to patents which are included in other
assets as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to
these patents was $0.2 million as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009. Amortization expense
related to these patents was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended October 2, 2009 and
October 3, 2008, and less than $0.1 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3,
2008. The Company also capitalized $2.9 million and $2.6 million of costs in other assets as of
October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively, related to orbital slots and orbital licenses that
have not yet been placed into service. If a patent, orbital slot or orbital license is rejected,
abandoned or otherwise invalidated, the unamortized cost is expensed in that period. During the
three and six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, the Company did not write off any costs due to abandonment or impairment.
Debt issuance costs
Debt issuance costs are amortized and recognized as interest expense on a straight-line basis
over the expected term of the related debt. During the three and six months ended October 2, 2009,
the Company paid and capitalized approximately $0.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in
additional debt issuance costs related to its amended and restated revolving credit facility (the
Credit Facility). Unamortized debt issuance costs are recorded in other assets in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. There was no debt issuance costs paid and capitalized for the three
and six months ended October 3, 2008.
Software development
Costs of developing software for sale are charged to research and development expense when
incurred, until technological feasibility has been established. Software development costs incurred
from the time technological feasibility is reached until the product is available for general
release to customers are capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net
realizable value. Once the product is available
8
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
for general release, the software development costs are
amortized based on the ratio of current to future revenue for each product with an annual minimum
equal to straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life of the product not
to exceed five years. The Company capitalized $2.5 million and $2.9 million of costs related to
software developed for resale for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively. The
Company capitalized $0.2 million related to software development for resale for the three and six
months ended October 3, 2008. There was no amortization expense of software development costs for
the three and six months ended October 2, 2009. The amortization expense of software development
costs was $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008,
respectively.
Self-insurance liabilities
The Company has a self-insurance plan to retain a portion of the exposure for losses related
to employee medical benefits. The Company also has a self-insurance plan for a portion of the
exposure for losses related to workers compensation costs. The self-insurance policies provide for
both specific and aggregate stop-loss limits. The Company utilizes internal actuarial methods, as
well as other historical information for the purpose of estimating ultimate costs for a particular
policy year. Based on these actuarial methods, along with currently available information and
insurance industry statistics, the Company recorded self-insurance liabilities of $1.3 million and
$1.4 million as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. The Companys estimate, which
is subject to inherent variability, is based on average claims experience in the Companys industry
and its own experience in terms of frequency and severity of claims, including asserted and
unasserted claims incurred but not reported, with no explicit provision for adverse fluctuation
from year to year. This variability may lead to ultimate payments being either greater or less than
the amounts presented above. Self-insurance liabilities have been classified as current in
accordance with the estimated timing of the projected payments.
Secured borrowings
Occasionally, the Company enters into secured borrowing arrangements in connection with
customer financing in order to provide additional sources of funding. As of October 2, 2009 and
April 3, 2009, the Company had no secured borrowing arrangements. In the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009, the Company paid all obligations related to its secured borrowing, under which the
Company pledged a note receivable from a customer to serve as collateral for the obligation under
the borrowing arrangement, totaling $4.7 million plus accrued interest.
During fiscal year 2008, due to the customers payment default under the note receivable, the
Company wrote down the note receivable by approximately $5.3 million related to the principal and
interest accrued to date. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company entered into
certain agreements with the note receivable insurance carrier providing the Company approximately
$1.7 million in cash payments and recorded a current asset of approximately $1.7 million and a
long-term asset of approximately $1.5 million as of April 3, 2009. Pursuant to these agreements,
the Company, during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 received an additional $0.7 million in
cash payment and as of October 2, 2009 recorded a current asset of approximately $1.7 million and a
long-term asset of approximately $1.0 million.
Indemnification provisions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company includes indemnification provisions in certain
of its contracts, generally relating to parties with which the Company has commercial relations.
Pursuant to these agreements, the Company will indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse the
indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not
limited to losses relating to third-party intellectual property claims. To date, there have not
been any costs incurred in connection with such indemnification clauses. The Companys insurance
policies do not necessarily cover the cost of defending indemnification claims or providing
indemnification, so if a claim was filed against the Company by any party the Company has agreed to
indemnify, the Company could incur substantial legal costs and damages. A claim would be accrued
when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. At October 2, 2009
and April 3, 2009, no such amounts were accrued.
Noncontrolling interest
A noncontrolling interest, previously referred to as minority interest, represents the equity
interest in a subsidiary that is not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to the Company
and is reported as equity of the Company, separately from the Companys controlling interest.
Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, net income or loss and other comprehensive income is reported in
the condensed consolidated financial statements at the consolidated amounts, which include the
amounts attributable to both the controlling and noncontrolling interest.
9
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
In April 2008, the Companys majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, issued additional shares
of preferred stock in which the Company invested $1.8 million in order to retain a constant
ownership interest. As a result of the transaction, TrellisWare also received $1.5 million in cash
proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock to its other principal stockholders.
Common stock held in treasury
During the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and during fiscal year 2009, the Company
delivered 138,604 and 94,181 shares of common stock, respectively, based on the vesting terms of
certain restricted stock unit agreements. In order for employees to satisfy minimum statutory
employee tax withholding requirements related to the delivery of common stock underlying these
restricted stock unit agreements, the Company repurchased 54,193 and 33,730 shares of common stock
with a total value of $1.3 million and $0.7 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2010
and during fiscal year 2009, respectively. Repurchased shares of common stock of 121,161 and 66,968
were held in treasury as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.
Derivatives
The Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts from time to time to
hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions. Gains and losses arising from foreign
currency forward and option contracts not designated as hedging instruments are recorded in
interest income (expense) as gains (losses) on derivative instruments. Gains and losses arising
from the effective portion of foreign currency forward and option contracts that are designated as
cash-flow hedging instruments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as
unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments until the underlying transaction affects the
Companys earnings, at which time they are then recorded in the same income statement line as the
underlying transaction.
During the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, the Company did not settle any foreign
exchange contracts; therefore, there were no realized gains or losses during the three and six
months ended October 2, 2009 related to derivative instruments. During the three and six months
ended October 3, 2008, the Company settled certain foreign exchange contracts and in connection
therewith recognized a loss of approximately $0.3 million, recorded in cost of revenues based on
the nature of the underlying transactions. The Company had no foreign currency forward contracts
outstanding as of October 2, 2009 or April 3, 2009.
Stock-based payments
The Company records compensation expense associated with stock options, restricted stock unit
awards and other stock-based compensation in accordance with the authoritative guidance for
share-based payments (SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment / ASC 718). The Company recognizes these
compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The
Company recognized $2.5 million and $5.1 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three
and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively, and $2.9 million and $5.0 million of
stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, respectively.
The Company recorded incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised and restricted
stock unit awards vesting of $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009
and October 3, 2008, respectively, which are classified as part of cash flows from financing
activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Income taxes
Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the authoritative
guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 / ASC
740). The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more
likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities,
based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The authoritative guidance for
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax
assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities,
accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and income tax disclosures.
Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the
current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is established for the expected future tax
consequences resulting from differences in the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax credit and loss
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a
10
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred income
tax expense (benefit) is the net change during the year in the deferred income tax asset or
liability.
Recent authoritative guidance
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities (SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R). The guidance will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under the current authoritative guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities (FIN 46R /
ASC 810) and is effective for the Company as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year
2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2009, the FASB issued amended authoritative guidance included within ASC 820 for the
fair value measurement of liabilities. This amended guidance clarifies that in circumstances in
which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the company
is required to use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted
prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets. If
these quoted prices are not available, the company is required to use another valuation technique,
such as an income approach or a market approach. This amended guidance will be effective for the
Company as of the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements and
disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for revenue recognition with multiple
deliverables (Emerging Issues Task Force 08-1, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,
(EITF 08-1)). This new guidance impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables
included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting.
Additionally, this guidance modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated
across the separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of
allocating arrangement consideration. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, however early adoption is permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements
and disclosures.
Note 2 Revenue Recognition
A substantial portion of the Companys revenues are derived from long-term contracts requiring
development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to
long-term contracts are accounted for under authoritative guidance for the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting (the AICPAs Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting for
Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, / ASC 605-35). Sales and
earnings under these contracts are recorded either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to
date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred related to the contract or as products are
shipped under the units-of-delivery method. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full
in the period in which losses become probable and estimable. Changes in estimates of profit or loss
on contracts are included in earnings on a cumulative basis in the period the estimate is changed.
During the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, the
Company recorded losses of approximately $3.7 million and
11
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
$0.2 million, respectively, related
to loss contracts. During the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, the Company
recorded losses of approximately $5.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, related to loss
contracts.
The Company also has contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of
products in accordance with authoritative guidance for revenue recognition (Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition / ASC 605). In this situation, contracts and
customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents
and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. The Company assesses whether
the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction
and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment, and assesses collectability based
primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as
well as the customers payment history.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair
value in accordance with authoritative guidance for accounting for multiple element revenue
arrangements, (EITF 00-21, Accounting for Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements / ASC 605-25),
and recognized when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. The
amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by the Companys judgments as to
whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether sufficient objective and
reliable evidence of fair value exists for those elements. Changes to the elements in an
arrangement and the Companys ability to establish evidence for those elements could affect the
timing of the revenue recognition.
In accordance with authoritative guidance for shipping and handling fees and costs (EITF
00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs / ASC 605-45), the Company records
shipping and handling costs billed to customers as a component of revenues, and shipping and
handling costs incurred by the Company for inbound and outbound freight are recorded as a component
of cost of revenues.
Collections in excess of revenues represent cash collected from customers in advance of
revenue recognition and are recorded as an accrued liability.
Contract costs on United States government contracts, including indirect costs, are subject to
audit and negotiations with United States government representatives. These audits have been
completed and agreed upon through fiscal year 2002. Contract revenues and accounts receivable are
stated at amounts which are expected to be realized upon final settlement.
Note 3 Fair Value Measurement
Effective March 29, 2008, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for financial assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements /
ASC 820). The guidance does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates
inconsistencies in prior authoritative guidance. The guidance defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and establishes a hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the
sources to be used to estimate fair value. As a basis for categorizing inputs, the guidance,
establishes the following hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value from
market based assumptions to entity specific assumptions:
|
|
Level 1 Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets at the measurement date. |
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
Level 3 Inputs which reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in
the market and significant to the instruments valuation. |
Effective April 4, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for its non-financial
assets and liabilities that are remeasured at fair value on a non-recurring basis without material
impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
The following tables present the Companys hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009:
12
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following section describes the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure
financial instruments at fair value:
Cash equivalents The Companys cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Certain
money market funds are valued using quoted prices for identical assets in an active market with
sufficient volume and frequency of transactions (Level 1). The remaining portion of money market
funds are valued based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets
with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or brokers model driven
valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be obtained from or corroborated
by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets (Level 2).
Long-term debt The Companys long-term debt consisted of revolving line of credit and is
reported at its borrowed outstanding amount with current accrued interest. However, for disclosure
purposes, the Company is required to measure the fair value of outstanding debt on a recurring
basis. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt approximates its carrying amount due to its
variable interest rate and the timing of the borrowing.
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts The Company had no foreign currency forward
exchange contracts outstanding at October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009.
Note 4 Earnings Per Share Attributable to ViaSat, Inc. Common Stockholders
Potential common stock of 1,430,479 and 1,394,686 shares for the three months ended October 2,
2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, and 1,509,319 and 1,256,262 shares for the six months ended
October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, were included in the calculation of diluted
earnings per share attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common stockholders. Antidilutive shares excluded
from the calculation were 1,154,426 and 1,652,275 shares for the three months ended October 2, 2009
and October 3, 2008, respectively, and 1,276,589 and 1,781,726 shares for the six months ended
October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively. Potential common stock includes: options granted
of 1,189,275 and 1,225,504, and restricted stock units awarded of 165,424 and 157,512 for the three
months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, and options granted of 1,145,827
and 1,120,722, and restricted stock units awarded of 233,424 and 96,973 for the six months ended
October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, under the Companys equity compensation plan
which are included in the earnings per share attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common stockholders
calculations using the treasury stock method; 75,780 and 11,670 of common shares for the three
months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, and 130,068 and 38,567 of common
shares for the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, expected to be
issued under the Companys employee stock purchase plan, shares potentially issuable under the
amended ViaSat 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for the Companys discretionary match which may be
settled in common stock or cash at the Companys election and shares related to other conditions
denoted in the Companys agreements with the predecessor stockholders of certain acquired
companies.
Note 5 Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Captions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed |
|
$ |
110,151 |
|
|
$ |
76,999 |
|
Unbilled |
|
|
96,735 |
|
|
|
87,469 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206,816 |
|
|
$ |
164,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
36,770 |
|
|
$ |
33,607 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
14,708 |
|
|
|
14,876 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
15,886 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,364 |
|
|
$ |
65,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
10,395 |
|
|
$ |
13,521 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
7,976 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,159 |
|
|
$ |
18,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and satellite, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment (estimated useful life 2-5 years) |
|
$ |
60,298 |
|
|
$ |
56,053 |
|
Computer equipment and software (estimated useful life 3 years) |
|
|
44,615 |
|
|
|
43,591 |
|
Furniture and fixtures (estimated useful life 7 years) |
|
|
10,104 |
|
|
|
9,918 |
|
Leasehold improvements (estimated useful life 2-11 years) |
|
|
18,023 |
|
|
|
17,573 |
|
Land |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
Satellite under construction |
|
|
154,871 |
|
|
|
110,588 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
7,720 |
|
|
|
5,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298,755 |
|
|
|
246,119 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(84,228 |
) |
|
|
(75,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
214,527 |
|
|
$ |
170,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other acquired intangible assets, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
|
$ |
44,392 |
|
|
$ |
44,392 |
|
Contracts and relationships |
|
|
18,898 |
|
|
|
18,898 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
9,323 |
|
|
|
9,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,689 |
|
|
|
81,689 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(67,901 |
) |
|
|
(65,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,788 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software costs, net |
|
$ |
3,606 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
Patents, orbital slots and other licenses, net |
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,729 |
|
|
|
13,771 |
|
Other |
|
|
14,520 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,827 |
|
|
$ |
31,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of warranty reserve |
|
$ |
6,574 |
|
|
$ |
6,853 |
|
Accrued vacation |
|
|
11,134 |
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
Accrued employee compensation |
|
|
10,128 |
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
Collections in excess of revenues |
|
|
38,826 |
|
|
|
26,811 |
|
Other |
|
|
14,464 |
|
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,126 |
|
|
$ |
72,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty |
|
$ |
4,413 |
|
|
$ |
4,341 |
|
Unrecognized tax position liabilities |
|
|
10,773 |
|
|
|
10,773 |
|
Deferred rent, long-term portion |
|
|
6,176 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,443 |
|
|
$ |
24,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its goodwill under the authoritative guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets (SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets / ASC 350). The guidance for
goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book value
of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them.
Reporting units within the Companys government systems and commercial networks segments have
goodwill assigned to them. The Company estimates the fair values of the reporting units using
discounted cash flows. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by an appropriate discount rate in
order to determine the present value of the cash flows. If the fair value is determined to be less
than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this
process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting
unit used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value
below carrying value, if any, represents the amount of goodwill impairment.
The Company will continue to make assessments of impairment on an annual basis in the fourth
quarter of its fiscal year or more frequently if specific triggering events occur. In assessing the
value of goodwill, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and
other factors to determine the fair value of the reporting units. If these estimates or their
related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges
that would negatively impact operating
results.
14
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The other acquired intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over
their estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. The technology intangible asset has
several components with estimated useful lives of five to nine years, contracts and relationships
intangible asset has several components with estimated useful lives of three to ten years,
non-compete agreements have useful lives of three to five years and other amortizable assets have
several components with estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. Amortization expense
was $1.4 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008,
respectively, and $2.9 million and $4.7 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 and
October 3, 2008, respectively.
Current and expected amortization expense for acquired intangibles for each of the following
periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the six months ended October 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 |
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
1,047 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2014 |
|
|
646 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Line of Credit
On July 1, 2009, the Company amended and restated the Credit Facility in the form of the
Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, which increased the Companys revolving line
of credit from $85.0 million to $170.0 million (including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit)
and extended the maturity date of the facility until July 1, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit
Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (a) the highest of the Federal Funds
rate plus 0.50%, the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% or the administrative agents prime rate as
announced from time to time, or (b) at the Eurodollar rate plus, in the case of each of (a) and
(b), an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of the Companys debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). At October 2, 2009, the effective interest
rate on the Companys outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 4.59%. The Credit
Facility is guaranteed by certain of the Companys domestic subsidiaries and collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys and the guarantors assets. At October 2, 2009, the Company had
$80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $6.9
million outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving borrowing availability under the
Credit Facility of $83.1 million.
On
September 30, 2009, the Company entered into the First Amendment
to the Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement (the
Amendment) to permit the issuance of
unsecured or secured senior indebtedness under an indenture up to an aggregate principal amount of
$300.0 million, the issuance of second-lien secured indebtedness up to an aggregate principal
amount of $350.0 million (less the principal amount of any unsecured or secured senior indebtedness
issued under an indenture), to permit the consummation of the Companys pending acquisition of
WildBlue Holding, Inc. (WildBlue), to insert a new financial covenant regarding maximum senior
secured leverage ratio and to amend financial covenants regarding maximum leverage ratio and
minimum interest coverage ratio.
On October 6, 2009, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company further
amended the Credit Facility to increase the Companys revolving line of credit from $170.0 million
to $210.0 million. On October 22, 2009, in connection with the Companys issuance of senior notes
due 2016 (the Notes) and receipt of the net proceeds therefrom, the Company repaid all outstanding borrowings
under the Credit Facility. See Note 14 for a discussion of the Companys senior notes due 2016.
On September 30, 2009, the Company entered into a second-lien loan agreement (the Bridge Loan
Agreement) with WildBlue debt holders in connection with the potential acquisition of WildBlue,
pursuant to which the WildBlue debt holders agreed to provide $350.0 million in second-lien bridge
financing. In connection with the closing of the Notes offering and the Companys receipt of the net
proceeds therefrom, on October 22, 2009, the Company exercised its right to terminate the Bridge
Loan Agreement and the intercreditor agreement relating thereto with
immediate effect.
Additionally under the Amendment, in the event that the Company entered into the Bridge Loan
Agreement, the Credit Facility was deemed to have been amended to include certain modified and
additional definitions, terms and covenants contained in an addendum to the Amendment (the
Addendum Provisions). The Amendment further provided that, at such time as no loans under (or
permitted refinancing of) the Bridge Loan Agreement remain outstanding and any commitment to
lend thereunder has been terminated, the Addendum Provisions shall cease to be in effect. On
October 22, 2009, the Company delivered a notice to the lenders under the Loan Agreement advising
that the Bridge Loan Agreement was terminated, and that accordingly the Addendum Provisions
became of no force and effect as of such date.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum
senior secured leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
In addition, the Credit
Facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, the Companys ability to sell
assets, make investments and acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends
and make certain other restricted payments. The Company was in compliance with its financial loan
covenants under the Credit Facility as of October 2, 2009.
Note 8 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on its products for periods of up to five years. The
Company records a liability for its warranty obligations when products are shipped or they are
included in long-term construction contracts based upon an estimate
of expected warranty
15
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
costs. Amounts expected
to be incurred within twelve months are classified
as a current liability. For mature products, the warranty cost estimates are based on historical
experience with the particular product. For newer products that do not have a history of warranty
costs, the Company bases its estimates on its experience with the technology involved and the type
of failures that may occur. It is possible that the Companys underlying assumptions will not
reflect the actual experience and in that case, future adjustments will be made to the recorded
warranty obligation. The following table reflects the change in the Companys warranty accrual
during the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
11,194 |
|
|
$ |
11,679 |
|
Change in liability for warranties issued in period |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
4,828 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
|
|
(3,299 |
) |
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
10,987 |
|
|
$ |
12,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims,
breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other matters. Although claims,
suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be
predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its current pending matters
will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
Note 10 Income Taxes
The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 25.1%
for fiscal year 2010, as compared to the actual 15.0% effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended
April 3, 2009. The higher effective tax rate for fiscal year 2010 reflects the December 31, 2009
expiration of the federal research and development tax credit and the inclusion of only nine months
of benefit. In addition, the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 included fifteen months of the credit
as a result of the October 2008 retroactive reinstatement of the previously expired credit from
January 1, 2008. The estimated effective tax rate is different from the expected statutory rate
due primarily to research and development tax credits and the manufacturing deduction.
For the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, the Companys gross unrecognized tax
benefits increased by $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. In the next twelve months it is
reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $3.5 million as a
result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for previously filed tax returns.
16
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 11 Segment Information
The Companys reporting segments, comprised of the government systems, commercial networks and
satellite services segments, are primarily distinguished by the type of customer and the related
contractual requirements. The Companys government systems segment develops and produces network
centric, IP-based secure government communications systems, products and solutions. The more
regulated government environment is subject to unique contractual requirements and possesses
economic characteristics which differ from the commercial networks and satellite services segments.
The Companys commercial networks segment develops and produces a variety of advanced end-to-end
satellite communication systems and ground networking equipment and products, and comprises the
Companys former satellite networks and antenna systems segments, except for the satellite services
segment. The Companys satellite services segment complements the commercial networks segment by
providing managed network services for the satellite communication systems of the Companys
enterprise and mobile broadband customers, and includes the Companys ViaSat-1 satellite-related
activities. The Companys segments are determined consistent with the way management currently
organizes and evaluates financial information internally for making operating decisions and
assessing performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
102,798 |
|
|
$ |
97,302 |
|
|
$ |
195,375 |
|
|
$ |
185,947 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
54,370 |
|
|
|
59,208 |
|
|
|
117,700 |
|
|
|
122,156 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
5,999 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
Elimination of intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
160,666 |
|
|
$ |
159,280 |
|
|
$ |
319,074 |
|
|
$ |
312,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profits (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
|
14,259 |
|
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
|
26,402 |
|
|
|
25,383 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
(4,042 |
) |
|
|
(2,825 |
) |
Elimination of intersegment operating profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit before corporate and amortization |
|
|
13,374 |
|
|
|
11,586 |
|
|
|
26,145 |
|
|
|
23,102 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles |
|
|
(1,362 |
) |
|
|
(2,340 |
) |
|
|
(2,867 |
) |
|
|
(4,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
12,029 |
|
|
$ |
9,303 |
|
|
$ |
23,300 |
|
|
$ |
18,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Amortization of acquired intangibles by segment for the three and six months ended October 2,
2009 and October 3, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
4,136 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of intangibles |
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
$ |
4,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets identifiable to segments include: accounts receivable, unbilled accounts receivable,
inventory, acquired intangible assets and goodwill. Segment assets as of October 2, 2009 and April
3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
163,800 |
|
|
$ |
145,568 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
187,066 |
|
|
|
164,844 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
353,224 |
|
|
|
311,690 |
|
Corporate assets |
|
|
385,294 |
|
|
|
311,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
738,518 |
|
|
$ |
622,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired intangible assets and goodwill included in segment assets as of October 2, 2009
and April 3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
|
$ |
2,792 |
|
|
$ |
22,161 |
|
|
$ |
22,161 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
11,540 |
|
|
|
13,863 |
|
|
|
43,268 |
|
|
|
43,268 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,788 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
$ |
65,429 |
|
|
$ |
65,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue information by geographic area for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009 and
October 3, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
United States |
|
$ |
134,360 |
|
|
$ |
134,070 |
|
|
$ |
260,402 |
|
|
$ |
262,494 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
13,140 |
|
|
|
39,599 |
|
|
|
21,997 |
|
Asia, Pacific |
|
|
6,034 |
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
12,436 |
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
North America other than United States |
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
4,909 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,666 |
|
|
$ |
159,280 |
|
|
$ |
319,074 |
|
|
$ |
312,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company distinguishes revenues from external customers by geographic areas based on
customer location.
The net book value of long-lived assets located outside the United States was $1.3 million and
$0.3 million at October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.
Note 12 Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
Michael Targoff, a director of the Company since February 2003, currently serves as the Chief
Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Loral Space & Communications,
Inc. (Loral), the parent of Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), and is also a director of Telesat
Holdings Inc., a joint venture company formed by Loral and the Public Sector Pension Investment
Board to acquire Telesat Canada in October 2007. John Stenbit, a director of the Company since
August 2004, also currently serves on the board of directors of Loral.
Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, the Company purchased a new high-capacity
Ka-band spot-beam satellite (ViaSat-1) designed by the Company and currently under construction by
SS/L for approximately $209.1 million, subject to purchase price adjustments based on satellite
performance. In addition, the Company entered into a beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby
Loral is responsible for contributing 15% of the total costs (estimated at approximately $57.6
million) associated with the ViaSat-1 satellite project. The Companys purchase of the ViaSat-1
satellite from SS/L was approved by the disinterested members of the Companys Board of Directors,
after a determination by the disinterested members of the Companys Board that the terms and
conditions of the purchase were fair to the Company and in the best interests of the Company and
its stockholders.
During the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, under the satellite
construction contract, the Company paid $35.9 million and $36.1 million, respectively, to SS/L and
had $7.7 million and a $9.7 million payable related to SS/L as of October 2, 2009 and April 3,
2009, respectively. Accounts receivable due from SS/L under the beam sharing agreement with Loral
were $2.6 million and $0.3 million as of October 2,
2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. Accounts receivable due from Telesat Canada as of
October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009 were $2.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
19
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 13 Acquisition
On September 30, 2009, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with WildBlue,
pursuant to which the Company has agreed to acquire WildBlue and its subsidiaries in exchange for
total consideration of $568.0 million (subject to certain adjustments). WildBlue is a provider of
broadband internet service, delivering two-way broadband internet access via satellite in the
contiguous United States. At the closing of the acquisition, the Company expects to pay $443.0
million of the merger consideration in cash and $125.0 million in newly issued shares of the
Companys common stock. Consummation of the acquisition is subject to regulatory approval by the
Federal Communications Commission, clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
of 1976 (the HSR Act), absence of any material adverse change in the Companys or WildBlues
business or financial condition, and other customary closing conditions and is expected to close in
the third or fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. On October 28, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission
granted early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act.
The number of shares of the Companys common stock to be issued at the closing will be
determined based on the volume weighted average closing price of the Companys common stock over a
10-day measurement period ending three trading days before closing, subject to a collar mechanism
to account for changes in the trading price between signing and closing. Based on the midpoint of
the collar, and assuming payment of $125.0 million in shares of the Companys common stock in
connection with the acquisition and no closing adjustments, the Company would issue approximately
4.9 million shares of the Companys common stock at the closing (which would have comprised
approximately 15.4% of the Companys outstanding common stock had the acquisition been consummated
on September 30, 2009). In no event will the Company be required to issue more than approximately
5.7 million shares of the Companys common stock. The Company has the right to substitute
additional cash for some or all of the shares of the Companys common stock under certain
circumstances.
The Company intends to finance the cash portion of the purchase price from a combination of
WildBlues and the Companys available cash on hand, the net proceeds from the issuance of the
Companys senior notes due 2016 and borrowings under the Credit Facility and/or additional third
party debt financing. See Note 14 for a discussion of the Companys senior notes due 2016.
Note 14 Subsequent Events
On
October 22, 2009, the Company issued $275.0 million in
senior notes due 2016 (the Notes) in a
private placement to institutional buyers. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 8.875% per year,
payable semi-annually in cash in arrears commencing in March 2010 and were issued with an original
issue discount of 1.24% or, $3.4 million. The Notes will be recorded as long-term debt, net of
original issue discount, in the Companys consolidated financial statements. The original issue
discount and deferred financing cost associated with the issuance of
the Notes will be amortized to
interest expense over the term of the Notes.
The Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of the Companys existing and
future subsidiaries that guarantees the Credit Facility. The Notes and the guarantees are the
Companys and the guarantors general senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of
payment with all of their existing and future unsecured unsubordinated debt. The Notes and the
guarantees are effectively junior in right of payment to their existing and future secured debt,
including under the Credit Facility (to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt),
are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities (including trade payables) of
the Companys subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the Notes, and are senior in right of payment
to all of their existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
The indenture governing the Notes limits, among other things, the Companys and its restricted
subsidiaries ability to: incur, assume or guarantee additional debt; issue redeemable stock and
preferred stock; pay dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay,
redeem or repurchase subordinated debt; make loans and investments; grant or incur liens; restrict
dividends, loans or asset transfers from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of
assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; reduce the Companys satellite insurance; and
consolidate or merge with, or sell substantially all of their assets to, another person.
Prior to September 15, 2012, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the Notes at a redemption
price of 108.875% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
thereon to the redemption date, from the net cash proceeds of specified equity offerings. Prior to
September 15, 2012, the Company may also redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the applicable premium and any accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the redemption date. The applicable premium is calculated as
the greater of: (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of such Notes and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a)
the present value at such date of redemption of (1) the redemption price of such Notes on September
15, 2012 plus (2) all required interest payments due on such Notes through September 15, 2012
(excluding accrued but unpaid interest to the date of redemption), computed using a discount rate
equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, over (b) the then-outstanding principal amount of
such Notes. The Notes may be
redeemed, in whole or
20
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
in part, at any time during the twelve months
beginning on September
15, 2012 at a redemption price of 106.656%, during the twelve months beginning on September
15, 2013 at a redemption price of 104.438%, during the twelve months beginning on September 15,
2014 at a redemption price of 102.219%, and at any time on or after September 12, 2015 at a
redemption price of 100%, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the
redemption date.
In
the event a change of control occurs, as defined under the indenture and prior to
the Company exercising its right to redeem all of the Notes, each holder will have the right to
require the Company to repurchase all or any part (equal to $2,000 or larger integral multiples of
$1,000) of such holders Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal
amount of the Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase
(subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on
the relevant interest payment date).
In connection with the private placement of the Notes, the Company and the guarantors entered
into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers in which the Company agreed to
file a registration statement with the SEC to permit the holders to exchange or resell the Notes.
The Company must use commercially reasonable efforts to consummate an exchange offer within 365
days after the issuance of the Notes or, under certain circumstances, to prepare and file a shelf
registration statement to cover the resale of the Notes. If the Company and the guarantors do not
comply with certain of their obligations under the registration rights agreement, the registration
rights agreement provides that additional interest will accrue on the principal amount of the Notes
at a rate of 0.25% per annum during the 90-day period immediately following such default and will
increase by 0.25% per annum at the end of each subsequent 90-day period, but in no event will the
penalty rate exceed 1.00% per annum.
21
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our
future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions
of our management. We use words such as anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate,
expect, goal, intend, may, plan, project, seek, should, target, will, would,
variations of such words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. In
addition, statements that refer to projections of earnings, revenue, costs or other financial
items; anticipated growth and trends in our business or key markets; future growth and revenues
from our products; future economic conditions and performance; anticipated performance of products
or services; plans, objectives and strategies for future operations; our pending acquisition of
WildBlue Holding, Inc. (WildBlue); and other characterizations of future events or circumstances,
are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are
only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to
predict, including those identified under the heading Risk Factors in Item 1A, elsewhere in this
report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Therefore, actual
results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Overview
We are a leading provider of advanced satellite and wireless communications and secure
networking systems, products and services. We have leveraged our success developing complex
satellite communication systems and equipment for the U.S. government and select commercial
customers to develop end-to-end satellite network solutions for a wide array of applications and
customers. Our product and systems offerings are often linked through common underlying
technologies, customer applications and market relationships. We believe that our portfolio of
products, combined with our ability to effectively cross-deploy technologies between government and
commercial segments and across different geographic markets, provides us a strong foundation to
sustain and enhance our leadership in advanced communications and networking technologies. Our
customers, including the U.S. government, leading aerospace and defense prime contractors, network
integrators and communications service providers, rely on our solutions to meet their complex
communications and networking requirements.
We conduct our business through three segments: government systems, commercial networks and
satellite services.
Government Systems
Our government systems segment develops and produces network-centric internet protocol
(IP)-based secure government communications systems, products and solutions, which are designed to
enable the collection and dissemination of secure real-time digital information between command
centers, communications nodes and air defense systems. Customers of our government systems segment
include tactical armed forces, public safety first-responders and remote government employees.
The primary products and services of our government systems segment include:
|
|
Tactical data links, including Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS)
terminals for military fighter jets, and their successor, MIDS Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS
JTRS) terminals (which we expect will be available in 2010), disposable weapon data links,
portable small tactical terminals and digital video data links for intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and ground systems, |
|
|
|
Information security and assurance products that enable military and government users to
communicate information securely over networks, and that secure data stored on computers and
storage devices, and |
|
|
|
Government satellite communication systems and products, including an array of portable
and fixed broadband modems, terminals, network access control systems and antenna systems using a
range of satellite frequency bands. |
22
Commercial Networks
Our commercial networks segment develops and produces a variety of advanced end-to-end
satellite communication systems and ground networking equipment and products that address five key
market segments: enterprise, consumer, in-flight, maritime and ground mobile applications. These
communication systems, networking equipment and products are generally developed through a
combination of customer and discretionary internal research and development funding.
Our satellite communication systems and ground networking equipment and products cater to a
wide range of domestic and international commercial customers and include:
|
|
Mobile broadband satellite communication systems and related products, designed for use
in aircraft, seagoing vessels and high-speed trains, |
|
|
|
Consumer broadband products and solutions, including next-generation satellite network
infrastructure and ground terminals, |
|
|
|
Satellite networking systems design and technology development, including design and
technology services covering all aspects of satellite communication system architecture and
technology, |
|
|
|
Enterprise Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) networks and products, designed to
provide enterprises with broadband access to the internet or private networks, and |
|
|
|
Antenna systems for terrestrial and satellite applications, specializing in small,
low-profile, multi-band antennas for mobile satellite communications. |
Satellite Services
Our satellite services segment complements our commercial networks segment by providing
managed network services for the satellite communication systems of our enterprise and mobile
broadband customers.
The primary services offered by our satellite services segment comprise:
|
|
|
Mobile broadband services, comprising network management services for customers who use
our Arclight-based mobile satellite systems, and |
|
|
|
|
Managed broadband services, comprising a full-service managed broadband service for
everyday enterprise networking or backup protection for primary networks. |
In order to expand our satellite services offerings, in 2008 we commenced construction of a
high-capacity Ka-band spot-beam satellite, ViaSat-1, which is planned for launch in early 2011.
Commencing in 2011, we expect this segment to also include wholesale broadband services utilizing
ViaSat-1.
Following
the consummation of our pending acquisition of WildBlue, the assets and results of operations of WildBlue will be included in our satellite services segment.
Sources of Revenues
To date, our ability to grow and maintain our revenues has depended on our ability to identify
and target markets where the customer places a high priority on the technology solution, and our
ability to obtain additional sizable contract awards. Due to the nature of this process, it is
difficult to predict the probability and timing of obtaining awards in these markets.
Our products are provided primarily through three types of contracts: fixed-price,
time-and-materials and cost-reimbursement contracts. Fixed-price contracts, which require us to
provide products and services under a contract at a specified price, comprised approximately 89%
and 85% of our revenues for the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008,
respectively, and 89% and 86% of our revenues for the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October
3, 2008, respectively. The remainder of our revenue for such periods was derived from
cost-reimbursement contracts (under which we are reimbursed for all
actual costs incurred in performing the contract to the extent such costs are
23
within the contract ceiling and allowable
under the terms of the contract, plus a fee or profit) and from time-and-materials contracts (which
reimburse us for the number of labor hours expended at an established hourly rate negotiated in the
contract, plus the cost of materials utilized in providing such products or services).
Historically, a significant portion of our revenues has been derived from customer contracts
that include the research and development of products. The research and development efforts are
conducted in direct response to the customers specific requirements and, accordingly, expenditures
related to such efforts are included in cost of sales when incurred and the related funding (which
includes a profit component) is included in revenues. Revenues for our funded research and
development from our customer contracts were approximately $27.8 million or 17% and $35.5 million
or 22% of our total revenues in the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008,
respectively. Revenues for our funded research and development from our customer contracts were
approximately $58.0 million or 18% and 64.4 million or 21% of our total revenues in the six months
ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively.
We also incur independent research and development expenses, which are not directly funded by
a third party. Independent research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and
other personnel-related expenses, supplies, prototype materials, testing and certification related
to research and development programs. Independent research and development expenses were
approximately 4% of revenues during the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, and
4% and 5% of revenues during the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008,
respectively. As a government contractor, we are able to recover a portion of our independent
research and development expenses pursuant to our government contracts.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of
our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on
managements judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. We describe the specific risks for these critical accounting
policies in the following paragraphs. For all of these policies, we caution that future events
rarely develop exactly as forecast, and even the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Revenue recognition
A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from long-term contracts requiring
development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to
these contracts are accounted for under authoritative guidance for the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting (the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of
Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain
Production-Type Contracts, / ASC 605-35). Sales and earnings under these contracts are recorded
either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be
incurred related to the contract or as products are shipped under the units-of-delivery method.
The percentage-of-completion method of accounting requires management to estimate the profit
margin for each individual contract and to apply that profit margin on a uniform basis as sales are
recorded under the contract. The estimation of profit margins requires management to make
projections of the total sales to be generated and the total costs that will be incurred under a
contract. These projections require management to make numerous assumptions and estimates relating
to items such as the complexity of design and related development costs, performance of
subcontractors, availability and cost of materials, labor productivity and cost, overhead and
capital costs and manufacturing efficiency. These contracts often include purchase options for
additional quantities and customer change orders for additional or revised product functionality.
Purchase options and change orders are accounted for either as an integral part of the original
contract or separately depending upon the nature and value of the item. For contract claims or
similar items, we apply judgment in estimating the amounts and assessing the potential for
realization. These amounts are only included in contract value when they can be reliably estimated
and realization is considered probable. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in
the period in which losses become probable and estimable. During the three months ended October 2,
2009 and October 3, 2008, we recorded losses of approximately $3.7 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, related to loss contracts. During the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3,
2008, we recorded losses of approximately $5.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, related to
loss contracts.
24
Assuming the initial estimates of sales and costs under a contract are accurate, the
percentage-of-completion method results in the profit margin being recorded evenly as revenue is
recognized under the contract. Changes in these underlying estimates due to revisions in sales and
future cost estimates or the exercise of contract options may result in profit margins being
recognized unevenly over a contract as such changes are accounted for on a cumulative basis in the
period estimates are revised.
We believe we have established appropriate systems and processes to enable us to reasonably
estimate future cost on our programs through regular quarterly evaluations of contract costs,
scheduling and technical matters by business unit personnel and management. Historically, in the
aggregate, we have not experienced significant deviations in actual costs from estimated program
costs, and when deviations that result in significant adjustments arise, we would disclose the
related impact in Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations. However, these estimates require significant management judgment and a significant
change in future cost estimates on one or more programs could have a material effect on our results
of operations. A one percent variance in our future cost estimates on open fixed-price contracts as
of October 2, 2009 would change our income before income taxes by approximately $0.4 million.
We also have contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of products
in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition (Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition / ASC 605). In this situation, contracts and customer
purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and
customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the sales
price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and
whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment, and assess collectability based
primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as
well as the customers payment history.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair
value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for accounting for multiple element revenue
arrangements (Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Accounting for Multiple Element
Revenue Arrangements / ASC 605-25), and recognized when the applicable revenue recognition
criteria for each element have been met. The amount of product and service revenue recognized is
impacted by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so,
whether sufficient objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for those elements. Changes
to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish evidence for those elements could
affect the timing of revenue recognition.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
We grant options to purchase our common stock and award restricted stock units to our
employees and directors under our equity compensation plans. Eligible employees can also purchase
shares of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last
day of each six-month offering period under our employee stock purchase plan. The benefits provided
under these plans are stock-based payments subject to the provisions of the authoritative guidance
for share-based payments (revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (SFAS
123R), Share-Based Payment / ASC 718). Stock-based compensation expense recognized under the
authoritative guidance for share-based payments for the three months ended October 2, 2009 and
October 3, 2008 was $2.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense
recognized under the authoritative guidance for share-based payments for the six months ended
October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008 was $5.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable based on historical bad
debts, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, our bad debt allowances have been minimal; a
contributing factor to this is that a significant portion of our sales has been to the U.S.
government. Our accounts receivable balance was $206.8 million, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $0.1 million, as of October 2, 2009, and $164.1 million, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $0.4 million, as of April 3, 2009.
Warranty reserves
We provide limited warranties on our products for periods of up to five years. We record a
liability for our warranty obligations when we ship the products or they are included in long-term
construction contracts based upon an estimate of expected warranty costs. Amounts expected to be
incurred within twelve months are classified as a current liability. For mature products, we
estimate the warranty costs based on historical experience with the particular product. For newer
products that do not have a history of warranty costs, we base our estimates
25
on our experience with the technology involved and the types of
failures that may occur. It is possible that our underlying assumptions will not reflect the actual
experience, and in that case, we will make future adjustments to the recorded warranty obligation.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
We account for our goodwill under authoritative guidance for goodwill and other intangible
assets (SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets / ASC 350). The guidance (SFAS 142 / ASC
350) for goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the
book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to
them. Reporting units within our government systems and commercial networks segments have goodwill
assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than book value, a second step is
performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this process, a fair value for goodwill is
estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the first step, and is
compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any,
represents the amount of goodwill impairment. We test goodwill for impairment during the fourth
quarter every fiscal year and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is
reasonably possible that an impairment may exist.
We estimate the fair values of the related operations using discounted cash flows and other
indicators of fair value. We base the forecast of future cash flows on our best estimate of the
future revenues and operating costs, which we derive primarily from existing firm orders, expected
future orders, contracts with suppliers, labor agreements and general market conditions. Changes in
these forecasts could cause a particular reporting unit to either pass or fail the first step in
the guidance (SFAS 142 / ASC 350) related to goodwill impairment model, which could significantly
influence whether a goodwill impairment needs to be recorded. We adjust the cash flow forecasts by
an appropriate discount rate derived from our market capitalization plus a suitable control premium
at the date of evaluation. In applying the first step, which is identification of any impairment of
goodwill, no impairment of goodwill has resulted.
Property, equipment and satellite
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures, and our ViaSat-1 satellite under
construction are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Costs are capitalized as
incurred and for our satellite include construction, launch and insurance. Satellite construction
costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured under long-term
contracts
that provide for payments by us over the contract periods. In
addition, interest expense is capitalized on the carring value of
the satellite during the construction period. Satellite construction and launch
services costs are capitalized to reflect progress toward completion, which typically coincides
with contract milestone payment schedules. Insurance premiums related to satellite launches and
subsequent in-orbit testing are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the
satellite. Performance incentives payable in future periods are dependent on the continued
satisfactory performance of the satellite in service.
Impairment of long-lived assets (property, equipment and satellite, and other intangible
assets)
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets
(SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets / ASC 360), we assess
potential impairments to our long-lived assets, including property, equipment and satellite and
other intangible assets, when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss when the
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) are less than the
assets carrying value. Any required impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the
assets carrying value exceeds its fair value, and would be recorded as a reduction in the carrying
value of the related asset and charged to results of operations. We have not identified any such
impairment.
Income taxes
Management evaluates the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a
valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In accordance with the authoritative guidance for income
taxes (SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes / ASC 740), net deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance if, based on all the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the authoritative
guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 / ASC 740). Under the guidance, we may recognize the tax
benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position
will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. The guidance addresses the derecognition of income tax
26
assets and liabilities, classification of
current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties
associated with tax positions, and income tax disclosures.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. In the
ordinary course of business, there are calculations and transactions where the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. In addition, changes in tax laws and regulations as well as adverse
judicial rulings could adversely affect the income tax provision. We believe we have adequately
provided for income tax issues not yet resolved with federal, state and foreign tax authorities.
However, if these provided amounts prove to be more than what is necessary, the reversal of the
reserves would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period in which we determine that
provision for the liabilities is no longer necessary. If an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our
estimate of tax liabilities, an additional charge to expense would result.
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
Management evaluates the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a
valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In accordance with SFAS 109 / ASC 740, net deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on all the available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We maintained a
valuation allowance of $2.1 million against deferred tax assets at October 2, 2009 and April 3,
2009 relating to state net operating loss carryforwards and research credit carryforwards available
to reduce state income taxes.
Results of Operations
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenues, income statement data for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
October 3, 2008 |
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Independent research and development |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
27
Three Months Ended October 2, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended October 3, 2008
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
160.7 |
|
|
$ |
159.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Revenues increased slightly from $159.3 million to $160.7 million during the second quarter of
fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last year. Increased revenues were experienced in
our government systems segment, which increased by $5.5 million, and our satellite services
segments, which increased by $0.7 million. These increases in our government systems segment and
satellite services segment revenues were offset by a decrease in our commercial networks segment
revenues of $4.8 million. Revenue increases in our government systems segment were primarily
derived from higher sales of $10.2 million in next-generation military satellite communication
systems and $1.9 million in video datalink systems, offset by a decrease in sales of $5.3 million
in information assurance products and development programs and $1.9 million in next-generation
tactical data link development. Our satellite services segment revenue increase of approximately
$0.7 million was primarily derived from increased customer usage of both our mobile broadband and
managed broadband services. Our commercial networks segment revenue decrease was mainly due to a
$4.2 million reduction in sales from our consumer broadband products and a $3.9 million reduction
in sales from our mobile satellite communications systems products, offset by higher sales of $2.5
million from our antenna systems products and higher sales of $0.8 million from our enterprise VSAT
products.
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
111.7 |
|
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
)% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
69.5 |
% |
|
|
72.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our quarterly cost of revenues decreased from $115.6 million to $111.7 million during the
second quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. We
experienced a decrease in cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues from 72.5% to 69.5%. This
improvement was primarily due to product cost reductions of approximately $2.2 million in our
government systems segment mainly relating to information assurance products and development
programs through a reduction of contractor costs, and product cost reductions of approximately $2.6
million in our commercial networks segment mainly derived from our enterprise VSAT product group.
Cost of revenues for the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008 included
approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in stock-based compensation expense.
Cost of revenues may fluctuate in future periods depending on the mix of products sold and services
provided, competition, new product introduction costs and other factors.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses of $3.5 million in the
second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was primarily
attributable to $2.5 million in transaction-related expenses incurred in connection with the pending WildBlue
acquisition and increased support costs related to business growth of approximately $1.0 million.
SG&A expenses consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for business development,
marketing and sales, bid and proposal, facilities, finance, legal, contract administration and
general management. Some SG&A expenses are difficult to predict and vary based on specific
government, commercial and satellite service sales opportunities, among other factors.
28
Independent research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Independent research and development |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent, research and development (IR&D) expense remained flat quarter-over-quarter. Our
commercial networks segment IR&D expense increased by approximately $0.1 million, offset by a
decrease in our government systems segment IR&D expense of approximately $0.1 million.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets. We amortize our acquired intangible assets from
prior acquisitions over their estimated useful lives ranging from eight months to ten years. We
expect our amortization of acquired intangible assets to decrease each year as the acquired
intangible assets with shorter lives become fully amortized. Current and expected amortization
expense for each of the following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the six months ended October 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 |
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
1,047 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2014 |
|
|
646 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income. Interest income decreased to $0.1 million for the three months ended October
2, 2009, from $0.6 million for the three months ended October 3, 2008, due primarily to lower
interest rates on our investments and lower average invested cash balances during the second
quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased slightly from $0.1 million for the three months
ended October 3, 2008 to $0.2 million for the three months ended October 2, 2009. We capitalized
$1.2 million of interest expense associated with the construction of our ViaSat-1 satellite during
the three months ended October 2, 2009 compared to no amounts capitalized during the corresponding
period of the prior fiscal year. The amount of such capitalized interest will depend on the
carrying value of the ViaSat-1 satellite and the duration of the construction phase of the project.
We expect to incur significantly more interest expense as a result of
the issuance on October 22, 2009 of our 8.875%
senior notes and will continue to capitalize additional interest related to our ViaSat-1 satellite
construction project.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended October 2, 2009
was approximately 23.6%, which is similar to the 25.1% estimated annual effective tax rate for
fiscal year 2010. In contrast, the effective tax rate for the three months ended October 3, 2008
was 5.2%, which reflected the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research and development tax
credit during the fiscal quarter. Our estimated annual effective tax rate of approximately 25.1%
for fiscal year 2010 reflects the current expiration of the federal research and development tax
credit at December 31, 2009. If the federal research and development tax credit is reinstated after
December 31, 2009, we may have a lower annual effective tax rate and the amount of the tax rate
reduction will depend on the effective date of any such reinstatement, the terms of the
reinstatement as well as the amount of eligible research and development expenses in the reinstated
period.
Segment Results for the Three Months Ended October 2, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended October 3, 2008
Government systems segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
102.8 |
|
|
$ |
97.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
The revenue increase in our government systems segment of approximately $5.5 million was
primarily derived from higher sales of $10.2 million in next-generation military satellite
communication systems and $1.9
million in video datalink systems, offset by a decrease in
29
sales of $5.3 million in information assurance products and development programs
and $1.9 million in next-generation tactical data link development.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenue |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our government systems segment operating profit of $1.0 million during the
second quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was
primarily due to increased revenues and related product contributions of $4.0 million, offset by
$3.1 million in higher selling, support and new business proposal costs
Commercial networks segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
Our commercial networks segment revenue decrease was attributable to a reduction in sales of
$4.2 million from our consumer broadband products and a $3.9 million reduction in sales from our
mobile satellite communication systems products, offset by higher sales of $2.5 million from our
antenna systems products and higher sales of $0.8 million from our enterprise VSAT products.
Segment operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
366.3 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial networks segment changed to an operating profit from an operating loss in the
second quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year. This segment
improvement was primarily due to lower selling, support and new business proposal costs of
approximately $2.1 million and additional product contributions of $1.4 million derived from sales
of higher margin products and the effects of certain antenna systems contract close-outs.
Satellite services segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
Our satellite services segment revenue increase of approximately $0.7 million was primarily
derived from increased customer usage of both our mobile broadband and managed broadband services.
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
(increase) |
|
(increase) |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
decrease |
|
decrease |
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(334.8 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(95.3 |
)% |
|
|
(27.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
The increase in satellite services segment operating loss of $2.6 million during the second
quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was primarily
due to approximately $2.5 million in transaction-related expenses incurred in connection with the
pending WildBlue acquisition.
Six Months Ended October 2, 2009 vs. Six Months Ended October 3, 2008
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
319.1 |
|
|
$ |
312.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Revenues increased from $312.2 million to $319.1 million during the first six months of fiscal
year 2010 when compared to the same period last year. Increased revenues were experienced in our
government systems segment, which increased by $9.4 million, and our satellite services segments,
which increased by $1.9 million, offset by a decrease in our commercial networks segment of $4.5
million. Revenue increases in our government systems segment were primarily derived from higher
sales of $12.7 million in next-generation military satellite communication and $1.7 million from
our majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (TrellisWare), offset by a decrease
in sales of $5.1 million in information assurance products and development programs. Our satellite
services segment revenue increase of approximately $1.9 million was primarily derived from
increased customer usage of our mobile broadband services. Our commercial networks segment revenue
decrease was mainly due to a reduction in sales of $8.4 million from our consumer broadband
products, offset by higher sales of $4.5 million from our enterprise VSAT products.
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
223.4 |
|
|
$ |
223.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
71.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our cost of revenues decreased slightly from $223.6 million to $223.4 million during the first
six months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2009. We experienced
a decrease in cost of revenues as a percent of revenues from 71.6% to 70.0%. This improvement was
primarily due to product cost reductions in our government systems segment mainly from information
assurance products and development programs. Cost of revenues for the six months ended October 2,
2009 and October 3, 2008 included approximately $1.2 million in stock-based compensation expense.
Cost of revenues may fluctuate in future periods depending on the mix of products sold and services
provided, competition, new product introduction costs and other factors.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
55.8 |
|
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in SG&A expenses of $6.8 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2010
compared to the same period of fiscal year 2009 was primarily attributable to $2.5 million in
transaction-related expenses incurred in connection with the pending WildBlue acquisition, increased support
costs related to business growth of approximately $2.0 million, and new business proposal costs for
new contract awards of approximately $3.0 million mainly in our government systems segment, offset
by lower selling costs of approximately $0.7 million mainly in our commercial networks segment.
SG&A expenses consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for business development,
marketing and sales, bid and proposal, facilities, finance, legal, contract administration and
general management. Some SG&A expenses are difficult to predict and vary based on specific
government, commercial and satellite service sales opportunities, among other factors.
31
Independent research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Independent research and development |
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(17.0 |
)% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in IR&D expenses of approximately $2.8 million reflects a year-over-year decrease
of $1.4 million in the commercial networks segment and $1.4 million in the government systems
segment for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period in fiscal
year 2009. These year-over-year decreases in IR&D expenses were principally due to a shift of some
of our efforts from internal development projects to customer-funded development.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets. We amortize our acquired intangible assets from
prior acquisitions over their estimated useful lives ranging from eight months to ten years.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets will decrease each year as the intangible assets with
shorter lives become fully amortized. Current and expected amortization expense for each of the
following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the six months ended October 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 |
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
1,047 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2014 |
|
|
646 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income. Interest income decreased to $0.2 million for the six months ended October 2,
2009, from $1.3 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008, primarily due to lower interest
rates on our investments and lower average invested cash balances.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased slightly from $0.2 million for the six months
ended October 3, 2008 to $0.4 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009. We capitalized $1.2
million of interest expense associated with the construction of our ViaSat-1 satellite during the
six months ended October 2, 2009 compared to no amounts capitalized during the corresponding period
of the prior fiscal year. The amount of such capitalized interest will depend on the carrying value
of the ViaSat-1 satellite and the duration of the construction phase of the project. We expect to
incur significantly more interest expense as a result of the issuance
on October 22, 2009 of our 8.875% senior notes
and will continue to capitalize additional interest related to our ViaSat-1 satellite construction
project.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended October 2, 2009
was approximately 24.7%, which is approximately equal to the 25.1% estimated annual effective tax
rate for fiscal year 2010. This compares to an effective tax rate of 20.0% for the six months
ended October 3, 2008, which reflected the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research and
development tax credit during such fiscal period. Our estimated annual effective tax rate of
approximately 25.1% for fiscal year 2010 reflects the current expiration of the federal research
and development tax credit at December 31, 2009. If the federal research and development tax credit
is reinstated after December 31, 2009, we may have a lower annual effective tax rate and the amount
of the tax rate reduction will depend on the effective date of any such reinstatement, the terms of
the reinstatement as well as the amount of eligible research and development expenses in the
reinstated period.
32
Segment Results for the Six Months Ended October 2, 2009 vs. Six Months Ended October 3, 2008
Government systems segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
195.4 |
|
|
$ |
185.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
The revenue increase in our government systems segment was primarily derived from higher sales
of $12.7 million in next-generation military satellite communication and $1.7 million from our
majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, offset by a decrease in sales of $5.1 million in
information assurance products and development programs.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
26.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenue |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government systems segment operating profits increased for the first six months of fiscal year
2010 when compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009. Increased revenues and related
product contributions of approximately $6.3 million and lower IR&D costs of approximately $1.4
million were offset by higher new business proposal costs of approximately $4.1 million and higher
selling and support costs of approximately $2.6 million.
Commercial networks segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
117.7 |
|
|
$ |
122.2 |
|
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Our commercial networks segment revenue decrease was mainly due to a reduction in sales of
$8.4 million from our consumer broadband products, offset by higher sales of $4.5 million
from our enterprise VSAT products.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
579.5 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial networks segment operating profit increased in the first six months of fiscal
year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year primarily due to a decrease in selling,
support and new business proposal costs of $1.9 million, lower IR&D costs of $1.4 million and
improved margins in certain antenna systems programs and related contract close-outs.
Satellite services segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
Our satellite services segment revenue increase of approximately $1.9 million was primarily
derived from increased customer usage of our mobile broadband services.
33
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 2, |
|
October 3, |
|
(increase) |
|
(increase) |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
decrease |
|
decrease |
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(43.1 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(67.4 |
)% |
|
|
(68.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in satellite services segment operating loss of $1.2 million in the first six
months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year was primarily due to
approximately $2.5 million in transaction-related expenses incurred in connection with the pending
WildBlue acquisition, offset by increased revenues and related product contributions of $0.8
million mainly derived from the international expansion of our mobile broadband service and a
reduction in legal and support costs related to our ViaSat-1 satellite of $0.4 million.
Backlog
As reflected in the table below, both funded and firm backlog increased during the first six
months of fiscal year 2009, primarily due to some expected large contract awards that we began
pursuing in fiscal year 2009 and for which negotiations were completed in fiscal year 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Firm backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems segment |
|
$ |
226.3 |
|
|
$ |
225.6 |
|
Commercial Networks segment |
|
|
253.7 |
|
|
|
238.7 |
|
Satellite Services segment |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
501.9 |
|
|
$ |
474.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems segment |
|
$ |
219.7 |
|
|
$ |
209.1 |
|
Commercial Networks segment |
|
|
253.7 |
|
|
|
187.1 |
|
Satellite Services segment |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
495.2 |
|
|
$ |
406.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract options |
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The firm backlog does not include contract options. Of the $501.9 million in firm backlog,
approximately $215.1 million is expected to be delivered during the remaining six months of fiscal
year 2010, and the balance is expected to be delivered in fiscal year 2011 and thereafter. We
include in our backlog only those orders for which we have accepted purchase orders.
Our total new awards were $225.7 million and $346.3 million for the three and six months ended
October 2, 2009, respectively, compared to $255.5 million and $461.4 million for the three and six
months ended October 3, 2008, respectively.
Backlog is not necessarily indicative of future sales. A majority of our contracts can be
terminated at the convenience of the customer. Orders are often made substantially in advance of
delivery, and our contracts typically provide that orders may be terminated with limited or no
penalties. In addition, purchase orders may present product specifications that would require us to
complete additional product development. A failure to develop products meeting such specifications
could lead to a termination of the related contract.
Firm backlog amounts as presented are comprised of funded and unfunded components. Funded
backlog represents the sum of contract amounts for which funds have been specifically obligated by
customers to contracts. Unfunded backlog represents future amounts that customers may obligate over
the specified contract performance periods. Our customers allocate funds for expenditures on
long-term contracts on a periodic basis. Our ability to realize revenues from contracts in backlog
is dependent upon adequate funding for such contracts. Although we do not control the funding of
our contracts, our experience indicates that actual contract fundings have ultimately been
approximately equal to the aggregate amounts of the contracts.
34
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have financed our operations to date primarily with cash flows from operations, bank line
of credit financing and equity financing. The general cash needs of our government systems,
commercial networks and satellite services segments can vary significantly and depend on the type
and mix of contracts in backlog (i.e., product or service, development or production, and timing of
payments), the quality of the customer (i.e., government or commercial, domestic or international)
and the duration of the contract. In addition, for all three of our segments, program performance
significantly impacts the timing and amount of cash flows. If a program is performing and meeting
its contractual requirements, then the cash flow requirements are usually lower. The cash needs of
the government systems segment tend to be more a function of the type of contract rather than
customer quality. Also, U.S. government procurement regulations tend to restrict the timing of cash
payments on the contract. In the commercial networks and satellite services segments, our cash
needs are driven primarily by the quality of the customer and the type of contract. The quality of
the customer can affect the specific contract cash flow and whether financing instruments are
required by the customer. In addition, the commercial networks and satellite services financing
environments tend to provide for more flexible payment terms with customers, including advance
payments.
Cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was $0.9
million as compared to $18.4 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2009. The $17.5
million decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year
2010 as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009 was primarily attributed to a
year-over-year net increase in cash used for net operating assets of $18.6 million, offset by
higher year-over-year net income of $1.7 million. The net operating asset growth was predominantly
due to growth in our combined billed and unbilled accounts receivable, net, which increased $42.7
million from the prior fiscal year-end. Receivables growth in the first six months of fiscal year
2010 was largely due to the timing of certain contract billing milestones on programs in both our
commercial networks segment and government systems segment.
Cash used in investing activities in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was $61.7
million as compared to $52.9 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2009. The increase in
cash used in investing activities was primarily related to construction payments for ViaSat-1 of
approximately $44.9 million and other additional capital expenditures for equipment of
approximately $10.9 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to approximately
$36.5 million and $14.1 million, respectively, for the same period of fiscal year 2009.
Cash provided by financing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was $80.8
million as compared to cash provided by financing activities for the first six months of fiscal
year 2009 of $0.6 million. The approximate $80.1 million increase in cash inflows for the first six
months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same period of last fiscal year is primarily related to
the $80.0 million in proceeds from borrowings under our the Credit Facility in July 2009. In
addition, cash provided by financing activities for both periods included cash received from stock
option exercises, cash inflows related to the incremental tax benefit from stock-based compensation
and cash received from employee stock purchase plan purchases. Cash provided by financing
activities in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was offset by the repurchase of common stock
related to net share settlement of certain employee tax liabilities in connection with the vesting
of restricted stock unit awards and debt issuance costs.
Satellite-related activities
In January 2008, we entered into several agreements with Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L),
Loral Space & Communications, Inc. (Loral) and Telesat related to our anticipated high-capacity
satellite system. Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, we purchased ViaSat-1, a new
high-capacity Ka-band spot-beam satellite designed by us and currently under construction by SS/L
for approximately $209.1 million, subject to purchase price adjustments based on satellite
performance. The total cost of the satellite is $246.0 million, but, as part of the satellite
purchase arrangements, Loral executed a separate contract with SS/L whereby Loral is purchasing the
Canadian beams on the ViaSat-1 satellite for approximately $36.9 million (15% of the total
satellite cost). We have entered into a beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral has agreed
to reimburse us for 15% of the total costs associated with launch and launch insurance, which is
estimated to be approximately $20.7 million, and in-orbit insurance and satellite operating costs
post launch.
In November 2008, we entered into a launch services agreement with Arianespace to procure
launch services for ViaSat-1 at a cost estimated to be $107.8 million, depending on the mass of the
satellite at launch. In March 2009, we substituted ILS International Launch Services, Inc. (ILS)
for Arianespace as the primary provider of launch services for ViaSat-1 and, accordingly, we
entered into a contract for launch services with ILS to procure launch services for ViaSat-1 at an
estimated cost of approximately $80.0 million,
subject to certain adjustments, resulting in a net savings of approximately $20.0 million.
35
On May 7, 2009, we entered into an Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement with
Arianespace. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement, Arianespace has
agreed to perform certain launch services to maintain the launch capability for ViaSat-1, should
the need arise, or for launch services of a future ViaSat satellite launch prior to December 2015.
This amendment and restatement also provides for certain cost adjustments depending on fluctuations
in foreign currencies, mass of the satellite launched and launch period timing.
The projected total cost of the ViaSat-1 project, including the satellite, launch, insurance
and related gateway infrastructure, through in-service of the satellite is estimated to be
approximately $400.0 million, excluding capitalized interest, and will depend on the timing of the
gateway infrastructure roll-out, among other things. However, we anticipate capitalizing certain
amounts of interest expense related to our outstanding borrowings in connection with our capital
projects under construction, such as construction of ViaSat-1 and related gateways. We continually
evaluate alternative strategies that would limit our total required investment. We believe we have
adequate sources of funding for the project, which includes our cash on hand, the cash we expect to
generate from operations over the next few years, and additional borrowing ability based on our
financial position and debt leverage ratio. We believe this provides us flexibility to execute this
project in an appropriate manner and/or obtain outside equity under terms that we consider
reasonable.
WildBlue acquisition
On September 30, 2009, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with WildBlue, pursuant
to which we have agreed to acquire WildBlue and its subsidiaries in exchange for total
consideration of $568.0 million (subject to certain adjustments). WildBlue is a provider of
broadband internet service, delivering two-way broadband internet access via satellite in the
contiguous United States. At the closing of the acquisition, we expect to pay $443.0 million of the
merger consideration in cash and $125.0 million in newly issued shares of our common stock.
Consummation of the acquisition is subject to regulatory approval by the Federal Communications
Commission, clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the HSR Act),
absence of any material adverse change in ours or WildBlues business or financial condition, and
other customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2010. On October 28, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of the waiting
period under the HSR Act.
The number of shares of our common stock to be issued at the closing will be determined based
on the volume weighted average closing price of our common stock over a 10-day measurement period
ending three trading days before closing, subject to a collar mechanism to account for changes in
the trading price between signing and closing. Based on the midpoint of the collar, and assuming
payment of $125.0 million in shares of our common stock in connection with the acquisition and no
closing adjustments, we would issue approximately 4.9 million shares of our common stock at the
closing (which would have comprised approximately 15.4% of our outstanding common stock had the
acquisition been consummated on September 30, 2009). In no event will we be required to issue more
than approximately 5.7 million shares of our common stock. We have right to substitute additional
cash for some or all of the shares of our common stock under certain circumstances.
We intend to finance the cash portion of the purchase price from a combination of WildBlues
and our available cash on hand, the net proceeds from the issuance of our senior notes due 2016
(see Senior notes due 2016 below) and borrowings under our Credit Facility and/or additional
third party debt financing.
Senior notes due 2016
On
October 22, 2009, we issued $275.0 million in senior notes
due 2016 (the Notes) in a private
placement to institutional buyers. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 8.875% per year, payable
semi-annually in cash in arrears commencing in March 2010 and
were issued with an original issue
discount of 1.24% or, $3.4 million. The Notes will be recorded as long-term debt, net of original
issue discount, in our consolidated financial statements. The original issue discount and
deferred financing cost associated with the issuance of the Notes will be amortized to interest
expense over the term of the Notes.
The
Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of our existing and future
subsidiaries that guarantees the Credit Facility. The Notes and the guarantees are our and the
guarantors general senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of
their existing and future unsecured unsubordinated debt. The Notes and the guarantees are
effectively junior in right of payment to their existing and future secured debt, including under
the Credit Facility (to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt), are structurally
subordinated to all existing and future liabilities (including trade payables) of our subsidiaries
that
are not guarantors of the Notes, and are senior in right of payment to all of their existing
and future subordinated indebtedness.
36
The indenture governing the Notes limits, among other things, our and our restricted
subsidiaries ability to: incur, assume or guarantee additional debt; issue redeemable stock and
preferred stock; pay dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay,
redeem or repurchase subordinated debt; make loans and investments; grant or incur liens; restrict
dividends, loans or asset transfers from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of
assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; reduce our satellite insurance; and consolidate or
merge with, or sell substantially all of their assets to, another person.
Prior to September 15, 2012, we may redeem up to 35% of the Notes at a redemption price of
108.875% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the
redemption date, from the net cash proceeds of specified equity offerings. Prior to September 15,
2012, we may also redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus the applicable premium and any accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
thereon to the redemption date. The applicable premium is calculated as the greater of: (i) 1.0% of
the principal amount of such Notes and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the present value at such
date of redemption of (1) the redemption price of such notes on September 15, 2012 plus (2) all
required interest payments due on such Notes through September 15, 2012 (excluding accrued but
unpaid interest to the date of redemption), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury
Rate plus 50 basis points, over (b) the then-outstanding principal amount of such Notes. The Notes
may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time during the twelve months beginning on September
15, 2012 at a redemption price of 106.656%, during the twelve months beginning on September 15,
2013 at a redemption price of 104.438%, during the twelve months beginning on September 15, 2014 at
a redemption price of 102.219%, and at any time on or after September 12, 2015 at a redemption
price of 100%, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the redemption
date.
In
the event a change of control occurs, as defined under the indenture and prior to
us exercising our right to redeem all of the Notes, each holder will have the right to require us
to repurchase all or any part (equal to $2,000 or larger integral multiples of $1,000) of such
holders Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase (subject to the
right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant
interest payment date).
In connection with the private placement of the Notes, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with the initial purchasers in which the Company agreed to file a registration statement
with the SEC to permit the holders to exchange or resell the Notes. We must use commercially
reasonable efforts to consummate an exchange offer within 365 days after the issuance of the Notes
or, under certain circumstances, to prepare and file a shelf registration statement to cover the
resale of the Notes. If we do not comply with certain of their obligations under the registration
rights agreement, the registration rights agreement provides that additional interest will accrue
on the principal amount of the Notes at a rate of 0.25% per annum during the 90-day period
immediately following such default and will increase by 0.25% per annum at the end of each
subsequent 90-day period, but in no event will the penalty rate exceed 1.00% per annum.
Credit Facility and liquidity
We invest our cash in excess of current operating requirements in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities. At October 2, 2009, we had $83.9 million in cash and
cash equivalents, $268.6 million in working capital and $80.0 million in principal amount of
outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. At April 3, 2009, we had $63.5 million in cash
and cash equivalents, $203.4 million in working capital and no outstanding borrowings under our
Credit Facility. Our cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third party
financial institutions. To date, we have experienced no loss of access to our cash equivalents;
however, there can be no assurance that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be
impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.
On July 1, 2009, we amended and restated our Credit Facility in the form of the Fourth Amended
and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, which increased our Credit Facility from $85.0 million to
$170.0 million (including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit) and extended the maturity date
of the facility until July 1, 2012. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our
option, at either (1) the highest of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%
or the administrative agents prime rate as announced from time to time, or (2) at the Eurodollar
rate plus, in the case of each of (1) and (2), an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of
our debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). At October 2,
2009, the effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was
4.59%. We anticipate capitalizing certain amounts of interest expense on our Credit Facility in
connection with the construction of ViaSat-1. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain of our
domestic subsidiaries and collateralized by substantially all of our respective assets. At October
2, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit
Facility and $6.9 million outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving borrowing
availability under the Credit Facility of $83.1 million.
37
On
September 30, 2009, we entered into the First Amendment to the
Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement (the Amendment) to permit the issuance of unsecured or
secured senior indebtedness under an indenture up to an aggregate principal amount of $300.0
million, the issuance of second-lien secured indebtedness up to an aggregate principal amount of
$350.0 million (less the principal amount of any unsecured or secured senior indebtedness issued
under an indenture), to permit the consummation of our pending acquisition of WildBlue, to insert a
new financial covenant regarding maximum senior secured leverage ratio and to amend financial
covenants regarding maximum leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio.
On October 6, 2009, we further amended the Credit Facility to increase our revolving line of
credit from $170.0 million to $210.0 million. On October 22, 2009, in connection with our issuance
of senior notes due 2016 and receipt of the net proceeds therefrom, we repaid all outstanding
borrowings under our Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum
senior secured leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
In addition, the Credit
Facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to sell assets, make
investments and acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends and make
certain other restricted payments.
On September 30, 2009, we entered into a second-lien loan agreement (the Bridge Loan Agreement)
with WildBlue debt holders in connection with the potential acquisition of WildBlue, pursuant to
which the WildBlue debt holders agreed to provide $350.0 million in second-lien bridge financing. In
connection with the closing of the Notes offering and our receipt of the net proceeds therefrom, on
October 22, 2009, we exercised our right to terminate the Bridge Loan Agreement and the intercreditor
agreement relating thereto with immediate effect.
Additionally under the Amendment, in the event that we entered into the Bridge Loan Agreement, the
Credit Facility was deemed to have been amended to include certain modified and additional
definitions, terms and covenants contained in an addendum to the Amendment (the Addendum
Provisions). The Amendment further provided that, at such time as no loans under (or permitted
refinancing of) the Bridge Loan Agreement remain outstanding and any commitment to lend
thereunder has been terminated, the Addendum Provisions shall cease to be in effect. On October 22,
2009, we delivered a notice to the lenders under the Loan Agreement advising that the Bridge Loan
Agreement was terminated, and that accordingly the Addendum Provisions became of no force and
effect as of such date.
To further enhance our liquidity position, we may obtain additional financing, which could
consist of debt, convertible debt or equity financing from public and/or private capital markets.
In April 2007, we filed an additional universal shelf registration statement with the SEC for the
future sale of up to an additional $200.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred
stock, depositary shares and warrants, bringing the aggregate available under our universal shelf
registration statements to up to $400.0 million. The securities may be offered from time to time,
separately or together, directly by us or through underwriters at amounts, prices, interest rates
and other terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the timing and amount
of cash required for the WildBlue acquisition, the timing and amount of cash required for the
ViaSat-1 satellite project pursuant to our contractual commitments, other future broadband
satellite projects we may engage in, expansion of our research and development and marketing
efforts, and the nature and timing of orders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate possible
acquisitions of, or investments in complementary businesses, products and technologies which may
require the use of cash. We believe that our current cash balances and net cash expected to be
provided by operating activities along with availability under our Credit Facility will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth a summary of our obligations at October 2, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fiscal year |
|
|
For the fiscal years ending |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011-2012 |
|
|
2013-2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
97,576 |
|
|
$ |
7,186 |
|
|
$ |
28,784 |
|
|
$ |
24,626 |
|
|
$ |
36,980 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
6,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments including satellite-related agreements |
|
|
377,877 |
|
|
|
93,943 |
|
|
|
112,264 |
|
|
|
27,460 |
|
|
|
144,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
562,353 |
|
|
$ |
101,428 |
|
|
$ |
147,649 |
|
|
$ |
132,086 |
|
|
$ |
181,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include contractual obligations relating to the issuance of our
8.875% senior notes due 2016 because they were issued subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal
year 2010. Also, due to our inability to accurately predict the likelihood and timing of the
closing of our pending WildBlue acquisition, the table above does not include contractual
obligations relating to or arising out of the WildBlue acquisition, including our obligation to pay
the purchase price of $568.0 million at the closing of the WildBlue acquisition (subject to certain
adjustments), of which we expect to pay $443.0 million in cash and $125.0 million in shares of our
newly issued common stock.
We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several subcontractors and contract
manufacturers to provide design and manufacturing services for our products. During the normal
course of business, we enter into agreements with subcontractors, contract manufacturers and
suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria defined by us or that
establish the parameters defining our requirements. We have also entered into agreements with
suppliers for the construction, operation and launch of ViaSat-1.
38
In addition, we have contracted for an additional launch which can be used as a
back-up launch for ViaSat-1 or for a future satellite. In certain instances, these agreements allow
us the option to cancel, reschedule and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior
to firm orders being placed. Consequently, only a portion of our reported purchase commitments
arising from these agreements are firm, non-cancelable and unconditional commitments.
Our condensed consolidated balance sheets included $24.4 million and $24.7 million of other
liabilities as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively, which primarily consists of our
long-term warranty obligations, deferred lease credits and long-term unrecognized tax position
liabilities. These remaining liabilities have been excluded from the above table as the timing
and/or the amount of any cash payment is uncertain. See Note 10 of the notes to condensed
consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our income taxes and related
tax positions and Note 8 for a discussion of our product warranties.
Recent Authoritative Guidance
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R
(SFAS 167). The guidance will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under the
current authoritative guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities (FIN 46R / ASC 810)
and is effective for us as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. We are
currently evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements
and disclosures.
In August 2009, the FASB issued amended authoritative guidance, included within ASC 820 for
the fair value measurement of liabilities. This amended guidance clarifies that in circumstances in
which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the company
is required to use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted
prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets. If
these quoted prices are not available, the company is required to use another valuation technique,
such as an income approach or a market approach. This amended guidance will be effective for us as
of the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact
that the guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for revenue recognition with multiple
deliverables (EITF 08-1, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). This new guidance
impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element
arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally, this guidance modifies
the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified
deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration.
This guidance will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, however
early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on
our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements at October 2, 2009 as defined in Regulation
S-K Item 303(a)(4) other than as discussed under Contractual Obligations above or disclosed in the
notes to our financial
statements included in this Quarterly Report or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended April 3, 2009.
39
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest rate risk
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade
accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term and long-term obligations, including the
revolving line of credit. We consider investments in highly liquid instruments purchased with a
remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of October
2, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under our Credit
Facility and we held no short-term investments. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest
rates relates primarily to borrowings under our Credit Facility, cash equivalents, short-term
investments and short-term obligations. As a result, we do not expect fluctuations in interest
rates to have a material impact on the fair value of these financial instruments.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same
time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk.
To minimize this risk, we maintain a significant portion of our cash balance in money market funds.
In general, money market funds are not subject to interest rate risk because the interest paid on
such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. Our cash and cash equivalents earn
interest at variable rates. Given recent declines in interest rates, our interest income has been
and may continue to be negatively impacted. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value
adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less
income than expected if interest rates fall. If the underlying weighted average interest rate on
our cash and cash equivalents, assuming balances remain constant over a year, changed by 50 basis
points, interest income would have increased or decreased by less than $0.1 million. Because our
investment policy restricts us to invest in conservative, interest-bearing investments and because
our business strategy does not rely on generating material returns from our investment portfolio,
we do not expect our market risk exposure on our investment portfolio to be material.
As of October 2, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings
under our Credit Facility. Our primary interest rate under the Credit Facility is the Eurodollar
rate plus an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of our debt to EBITDA. As of October 2,
2009, the effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was
4.59%. Assuming the outstanding balance remained constant over a year, a 50 basis point increase in
the interest rate would decrease interest incurred prior to effects of capitalized interest and
cash flow by approximately $0.4 million. As described above, on October 22, 2009, in connection
with our issuance of senior notes due 2016 and receipt of the net proceeds therefrom, we repaid all
outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility.
Foreign exchange risk
We generally conduct our business in U.S. dollars. However, as our international business is
conducted in a variety of foreign currencies and we pay some of our vendors in Euros, we are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our objective in managing our exposure
to foreign currency exchanges is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with
foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Accordingly, from time to time, we may enter into foreign
exchange contracts to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets,
liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency transactions.
As of October 2, 2009, we had no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving the objective that information in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified and pursuant to the requirements of the
SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer, CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, CFO, as appropriate to
allow for timely decision regarding required discloures. We carried out an evaluation, with the
participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO,
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 2, 2009, the end of
the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of
October 2, 2009.
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report, there have been no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to
intellectual property claims, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other
matters. Although claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their
results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of our current pending
matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us
because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is
possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity in a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial
condition, liquidity or future results. There have been no material changes to these risk factors,
other than:
|
|
the addition of, and changes to, the risk factors set forth below relating to our
indebtedness, which have been updated to reflect the issuance of our senior notes due 2016 in
October 2009; and |
|
|
|
the addition of the risk factors set forth below relating to our pending acquisition of
WildBlue. |
The risks described in our reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q are not the only risks facing our
company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to
be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity or
future results.
Our Level of Indebtedness May Adversely Affect Our Ability to Operate Our Business, Remain in
Compliance with Debt Covenants, React to Changes in Our Business or the Industry in which we
Operate, or Prevent Us from Making Payments on Our Indebtedness
As of October 2, 2009, we had $80.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under our
Credit Facility and $6.9 million outstanding under standby letters of credit. On October 22, 2009,
we issued $275.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior notes due 2016, and used a
portion of the net proceeds from such issuance to repay all outstanding borrowings under the Credit
Facility.
This level of indebtedness could have important consequences for you. For example, it could:
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt obligations, |
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, |
|
|
|
impair our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing in the future for working
capital, capital expenditures, product development, satellite construction, acquisitions or
general corporate or other purposes, |
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a material portion of our cash flows from operations to the payment of
principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash
flows to fund working capital needs, capital expenditures, product development, satellite
construction, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes, |
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the
industry in which we operate, |
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less indebtedness, and |
|
|
|
limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions. |
41
Any of these risks could materially impact our ability to fund our operations or limit our ability
to expand our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We May Incur Additional Indebtedness, which Could Further Increase the Risks Associated with Our Leverage
We may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which may include additional secured or
unsecured indebtedness to finance the payment of some or all of the balance of the cash
consideration for the WildBlue acquisition or for general corporate purposes, which may include
financing relating to ViaSat-1, other potential acquisitions, working capital or capital
expenditures.
In April 2007, we filed an additional universal shelf registration statement with the SEC for the
future sale of up to an additional $200.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred
stock, depositary shares and warrants, bringing the aggregate available under our universal shelf
registration statements to up to $400.0 million. The securities may be offered from time to time,
separately or together, directly by us or through underwriters at amounts, prices, interest rates
and other terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
If new indebtedness is added to our current level of indebtedness, the related risks that we now
face could intensify.
We May Not Be Able to Generate Sufficient Cash to Service All of Our Indebtedness and Fund Our
Working Capital and Capital Expenditures, and May Be Forced to Take Other Actions to Satisfy Our
Obligations under Our Indebtedness, which May Not Be Successful
Our ability to make scheduled payments on our indebtedness will depend upon our future operating
performance and on our ability to generate cash flow in the future, which is subject to general
economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are
beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from
operations, or that future borrowings, including borrowings under our Credit Facility, will be
available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other
liquidity needs.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we
could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investment and
capital expenditures or to dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional equity capital
or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We may not be able to effect any such alternative
measures, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if successful, such
alternative actions may not allow us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. Our Credit
Facility and the indenture governing our senior notes restrict our ability to dispose of assets and
use the proceeds from the disposition.
If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and, as a result, the
holders of our senior notes due 2016 and the lenders under our Credit Facility could declare all
outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable, the lenders under our Credit Facility
could terminate their commitments to loan money and foreclose against the assets securing the
borrowings under the Credit Facility, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
We May Be Unable to Refinance Our Indebtedness
We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity, including
indebtedness under the indenture governing our senior notes due 2016 and any indebtedness under our
Credit Facility. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient funds to
enable us to repay or refinance our debt obligations on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
Covenants in Our Debt Agreements Restrict Our Business and Could Limit Our Ability to Implement Our Business Plan
The Credit Facility and the indenture governing our senior notes due 2016 contain covenants that
may restrict our ability to implement our business plan, finance future operations, respond to
changing business and economic conditions, secure additional financing, and engage in opportunistic
transactions, such as strategic acquisitions. In addition, if we fail to satisfy the covenants
contained in our Credit Facility, our ability to borrow under our Credit Facility may be
restricted. The Credit Facility and the indenture governing our senior notes due 2016 include
covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to do the following:
|
|
incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness, |
|
|
|
issue redeemable stock and preferred stock, |
42
|
|
grant or incur liens, |
|
|
|
sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries, |
|
|
|
make loans and investments, |
|
|
|
pay dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock, |
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates, |
|
|
|
reduce our satellite insurance, and |
|
|
|
consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another
person. |
The covenants in our Credit Facility are generally more restrictive than the indenture governing
our senior notes due 2016. In addition, our Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain
financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio
and minimum interest coverage ratio.
If we default under our Credit Facility or the indenture governing our senior notes due 2016
because of a covenant breach or otherwise, all outstanding amounts thereunder could become
immediately due and payable. In the past we have violated our Credit Facility covenants and
received waivers for these violations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with our
financial or other covenants under our Credit Facility or the indenture governing our senior notes
due 2016 or that any covenant violations will be waived in the future. Any violation that is not
waived could result in an event of default, permitting our lenders to declare outstanding
indebtedness and interest thereon due and payable, and permitting the lenders under our Credit
Facility to suspend commitments to make any advance or to require any outstanding letters of credit
to be collateralized by an interest bearing cash account, any or all of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we
fail to comply with our financial or other covenants under our Credit Facility or the indenture
governing our senior notes due 2016, we may need additional financing in order to service or
extinguish our indebtedness. We may not be able to obtain financing or refinancing on terms
acceptable to us, if at all. We cannot assure you that we would have sufficient funds to repay all
the outstanding amounts under our Credit Facility or the indenture governing our senior notes due
2016, and any acceleration of amounts due would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and
financial condition.
We May Experience Difficulties in Integrating WildBlues Business and the Anticipated Benefits of
the WildBlue Acquisition May Not Be Realized Fully (or at All) and May Take Longer to Realize than
Expected
If our pending acquisition of WildBlue is consummated, our future performance will depend in part
on whether we can successfully integrate the WildBlue business with our satellite services segment
in an effective and efficient manner. Integrating our satellite services segment with the WildBlue
business will be a complex, time-consuming and expensive process and involve a number of risks,
including:
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from the management of our daily operations to the
integration of the WildBlue business, |
|
|
|
additional demands on management related to the increase in the size and scope of our company
following the acquisition, |
|
|
|
difficulties in combining corporate cultures, |
|
|
|
difficulties in the assimilation and retention of key employees, |
|
|
|
difficulties in maintaining relationships with present and potential customers, distributors
and suppliers of the WildBlue business, |
|
|
|
difficulties in converting the WildBlue business current business information systems to our
systems, |
|
|
|
challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings, operational efficiencies,
synergies and other benefits expected from the WildBlue acquisition, |
43
|
|
difficulties in the integration, assimilation, implementation or modification of platforms,
systems, functions, technologies and infrastructure to support the combined business, as well
as maintaining uniform standards, controls (including internal accounting controls),
procedures and policies, and |
|
|
|
costs and expenses associated with any undisclosed or potential liabilities of the WildBlue
business. |
Delays or unexpected difficulties or additional costs in the integration process could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if we
are able to integrate the WildBlue business successfully, this integration may not result in the
realization of the full benefits of synergies, cost savings, revenue enhancements, growth,
operational efficiencies and other benefits that we expect. We cannot assure you that we will
successfully integrate the WildBlue business with our business or achieve the desired benefits from
the WildBlue acquisition within a reasonable period of time or at all.
The WildBlue Business Is Subject to its Own Risks, Which We May Not Be Able to Manage Successfully.
There May Be Additional Risks Resulting from the WildBlue Acquisition that Are Not Presently Known
to Us and We Generally Have No Right to Indemnification under the Agreement and Plan of Merger for
the Acquisition
The results of operations of the WildBlue business are subject to many of the same risks that
affect our business, financial condition and results of operation, as well as additional risks
relating to the ownership of its in-orbit satellite, WildBlue-1, and its lease of capacity on
Telesats Anik F2 satellite. Risks relating to the WildBlue business include:
|
|
rapid technological and industry changes making its service obsolete or outdated, |
|
|
|
inherent limitations in its satellite technology, |
|
|
|
demand and pricing pressure on its products and services, |
|
|
|
satellite failures, anomalies, malfunctions or degradation in satellite performance, |
|
|
|
the limited useful lives of, and the expense related to replacing, its existing satellites, |
|
|
|
WildBlues reliance on orbital licenses issued by the International Telecommunication Union
(the ITU), some of which are held by third parties, and the FCC, and on frequency coordination
and orbital co-location agreements in support of both WildBlue-1 and Anik F2, which may be
terminated in certain circumstances, and |
|
|
|
WildBlues reliance on third party suppliers, distributors and customer support vendors. |
Any of the above risks could have a material adverse affect on WildBlues business, financial
condition and results of operation. There may be additional risks relating to the WildBlue business
that are not presently known to us. Any discovery of adverse information concerning the WildBlue
business after the closing of the acquisition, if consummated, could be material. The
representations and warranties in the Agreement and Plan of Merger do not survive the closing of
the WildBlue acquisition, and we generally have no right to indemnification with respect to any
losses that we may incur resulting from the WildBlue acquisition or the prior operations of the
WildBlue business. Accordingly, a material loss associated with the WildBlue acquisition could have
a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operation or reputation,
and materially reduce the anticipated benefits of the WildBlue acquisition.
Uncertainty Regarding the WildBlue Acquisition May Cause Actual or Potential Customers, Suppliers,
Distributors, Resellers and Others to Delay or Defer Decisions Concerning WildBlue or Us, Which May
Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our or WildBlues Business, Financial Condition or Results of
Operation
In response to the announcement or completion of the WildBlue acquisition, actual or potential
customers, suppliers, distributors, resellers and others may delay or defer purchasing, supply or
distribution decisions or otherwise alter existing relationships with us or WildBlue. Prospective
customers could be reluctant to purchase our and WildBlues products and services due to
uncertainty about the direction of the combined companys products and services and willingness to
support and service existing products and services. In addition, customers, suppliers,
distributors, resellers and others may seek to change existing agreements with us or WildBlue as a
result of the WildBlue acquisition. These and other actions by customers, suppliers, distributors,
resellers or others could negatively affect the business of the combined company.
44
The WildBlue Business Has a History of Losses and May Continue to Experience Losses in the Future.
WildBlue experienced net losses of $15.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and $80.6
million, $126.9 million and $115.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. If our pending acquisition of WildBlue is consummated, we cannot assure you that the
WildBlue business will generate net income in the future on a consistent basis or at all. We cannot
estimate with any certainty whether demand for our broadband satellite services will be sufficient
for us to maintain or increase the number of WildBlue subscribers. If the WildBlue business fails
to achieve profitability, that failure could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders held on October 1, 2009 the stockholders voted on
the following three proposals and cast their votes as follows:
Proposal 1: To elect Robert W. Johnson and John P. Stenbit to serve as Class I Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Robert W. Johnson |
|
|
26,877,722 |
|
|
|
902,714 |
|
John P. Stenbit |
|
|
26,900,096 |
|
|
|
880,340 |
|
Proposal 2: To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 2, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Not Voted |
27,627,058
|
|
140,868
|
|
12,510
|
|
0 |
Proposal 3: To approve an amendment to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Not Voted |
17,781,701
|
|
4,514,024
|
|
80,741
|
|
5,313,970 |
Item 6. Exhibits
The
Exhibit Index on page 47 is incorporated herein by reference as the list of exhibits
required as part of this Quarterly Report.
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2009 |
VIASAT, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
46
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as
of September 30,
2009, by and among
ViaSat, Inc.,
WildBlue Holding,
Inc. and Aloha
Merger Sub, Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
10/2/2009 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Indenture, dated as
of October 22,
2009, among ViaSat,
Inc., ViaSat Credit
Corp., Enerdyne
Technologies, Inc.,
ViaSat Satellite
Ventures, LLC, VSV
I Holdings, LLC,
VSV II Holdings,
LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures
U.S. I, LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures
U.S. II, LLC and
Wilmington Trust
FSB, as trustee
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
10/22/2009 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Form of 8.875%
Senior Note of
ViaSat, Inc. due
2016 (attached as
Exhibit A to the
Indenture filed as
Exhibit 4.1 hereto)
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
10/22/2009 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Registration Rights
Agreement, dated as
of October 22,
2009, among ViaSat,
Inc., ViaSat Credit
Corp., Enerdyne
Technologies, Inc.,
ViaSat Satellite
Ventures, LLC, VSV
I Holdings, LLC,
VSV II Holdings,
LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures
U.S. I, LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures
U.S. II, LLC, J.P.
Morgan Securities
Inc., Banc of
America Securities
LLC, Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC,
Oppenheimer & Co.
Inc. and Stephens
Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
10/22/2009 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
First Amendment to
Fourth Amended and
Restated Revolving
Loan Agreement,
dated as of
September 30, 2009,
by and among
ViaSat, Inc., Banc
of America
Securities LLC,
Bank of America,
N.A., JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A.,
Union Bank, N.A.,
and other lenders
party thereto
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/2/2009 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Second Amendment to
Fourth Amended and
Restated Revolving
Loan Agreement,
dated as of October
6, 2009, by and
among ViaSat, Inc.,
Banc of America
Securities LLC,
Bank of America,
N.A., JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A.,
Union Bank, N.A.,
Wells Fargo Bank,
National
Association and
other lenders party
thereto
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/9/2009 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
ViaSat, Inc.
Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (As
Amended and
Restated Effective
July 1, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/5/2009 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
1996 Equity
Participation Plan
of ViaSat, Inc. (As
Amended and
Restated Effective
September 29, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
10/5/2009 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Form of
Non-Employee
Director Restricted
Stock Unit Award
Agreement for the
ViaSat, Inc. 1996
Equity
Participation Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
10/5/2009 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications
Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section
906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
47
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark D. Dankberg, Chief Executive Officer of ViaSat, Inc., certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViaSat, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Date: November 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Ronald G. Wangerin, Chief Financial Officer of ViaSat, Inc., certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViaSat, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Date: November 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:
(a) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended October 2, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: November 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:
(a) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended October 2, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: November 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|